Non-operative management for osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review of treatment modalities, clinical- and radiological outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to assess the overall clinical success rate of non-operative management for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE), COCHRANE and EMBASE (Ovid) databases. Clinical success rates per separate study were calculated at the latest moment of follow-up and were defined as successful when a good or excellent clinical result at follow-up was reported in a qualitative manner or when a post-operative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at or above 80 was reached. When clinical outcomes were based on other clinical scoring systems, outcomes reported as good or excellent were considered as clinical success. Studies methodologically eligible for a simplified pooling method were combined to calculate an overall pooled clinical success rate. Radiological changes over the course of conservative treatment were assessed either considering local OLT changes and/or overall ankle joint changes. RESULTS: Thirty articles were included, including an overall of 868 patients. The median follow-up of the included studies was 37 months (range: 3-288 months). A simplified pooling method was possible among 16 studies and yielded an overall pooled clinical success rate of 45% (95% CI 40-50%). As assessed with plain radiographs, progression of ankle joint osteoarthritis was observed in of 9% (95% CI 6-14%) of the patients. As assessed through a Computed Tomography (CT) scan, focal OLT deterioration was observed in 11% (95% CI 7-18%) of the patients. As assessed with a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan, focal OLT deterioration was observed in 12% (95% CI 6-24%) of the patients. An unchanged lesion was detected on plain radiographs in 53% (48/91; CI 43-63%), 76% (99/131; 95% CI 68-82%) on a CT scan and on MRI in 84% (42/50; 95% CI 71-92%) of the patients. CONCLUSION: The current literature on non-operative management of OLTs is scarce and heterogeneous on indication and type of treatment. Promising clinical results are presented but need to interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity in indication, duration and type of treatment. Further studies need to focus on specific types on conservative management, indications and its results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, Level IV.

Good Interrater Reliability for Standardized MRI Assessment of Tendon Discontinuity and Tendon Retraction in Acute Proximal Full-Thickness Hamstring Tendon Injury.

BACKGROUND: Proximal full-thickness free hamstring tendon injury (ie, tendon avulsion or rupture) is a severe injury. Treatment decision making relies on clinical factors and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) variables; it specifically relies on which tendons are injured as well as the extent of tendon retraction. According to a worldwide evaluation of current practice, discontinuity of both proximal tendons and retraction of >2 cm are used as surgical indications. However, both the diagnosis and the use of MRI variables in decision making may be fraught with uncertainty in clinical practice. A reliable standardized MRI assessment is required. PURPOSE: To propose an MRI assessment for acute proximal full-thickness free hamstring tendon injury and to evaluate its interater reliability. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: We included 40 MRI scans of patients with acute (≤4 weeks of injury) proximal full-thickness free hamstring tendon injury. Three musculoskeletal radiologists assessed proximal full-thickness free hamstring tendon discontinuity using the novel "dropped ice cream sign" and tendon retraction (in mm). Quantification of tendon retraction (in mm) was performed using 2 different methods: (1) a direct (ie, shortest distance between the center of the hamstring origin and the tendon stump) method and (2) a combined craniocaudal/mediolateral measurement method. Absolute and relative interrater reliability were calculated. RESULTS: We found an almost perfect interrater agreement (kappa = 0.87) for assessment of full-thickness tendon discontinuity using the dropped ice cream sign. Interrater agreement for the direct and craniocaudal retraction measurements was good for both the conjoint (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.88 and 0.83) and the semimembranosus tendons (ICC, 0.81 and 0.79). The mediolateral retraction measurement yielded only moderate to poor reliability for the conjoint (ICC, 0.53) and semimembranosus tendons (ICC, 0.41). CONCLUSION: The standardized MRI assessment to identify proximal hamstring tendon discontinuity and quantify tendon retraction is reliable. We recommend using the novel dropped ice cream sign and the direct retraction measurement in clinical practice and research.

Six out of ten patients with sinus tarsi syndrome returned to pre-injury type of sport after subtalar arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine multiple return to sport rates, long-term clinical outcomes and safety for subtalar arthroscopy for sinus tarsi syndrome. METHODS: Subtalar arthroscopies performed for sinus tarsi syndrome between 2013 and 2018 were analyzed. Twenty-two patients were assessed (median age: 28 (IQR 20-40), median follow-up 60 months (IQR 42-76). All patients were active in sports prior to the injury. The primary outcome was the return to pre-injury type of sport rate. Secondary outcomes were time and rate of return to any type of sports, return to performance and to improved performance. Clinical outcomes consisted of Numerous Rating Scale of pain, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, 36-item Short Form Survey and complications and re-operations. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the patients returned to their preoperative type of sport at a median time of 23 weeks post-operatively (IQR 9.0-49), 95% of the patients returned to any type and level sport at a median time of 12 weeks post-operatively (IQR 4.0-39), 18% returned to their preoperative performance level at a median time of 25 weeks post-operatively (IQR 8.0-46) and 5% returned to improved performance postoperatively at 28 weeks postoperatively (one patient). Median NRS in rest was 1.0 (IQR 0.0-4.0), 2.0 during walking (IQR 0.0-5.3) during walking, 3.0 during running (IQR 1.0-8.0) and 2.0 during stair-climbing (IQR 0.0-4.5). The summarized FAOS score was 62 (IQR 50-90). The median SF-36 PCSS and the MCSS were 46 (IQR 41-54) and 55 (IQR 49-58), respectively. No complications and one re-do subtalar arthroscopy were reported. CONCLUSION: Six out of ten patients with sinus tarsi syndrome returned to their pre-injury type of sport after being treated with a subtalar arthroscopy. Subtalar arthroscopy yields effective outcomes at long-term follow-up concerning patient-reported outcome measures in athletic population, with favorable return to sport level, return to sport time, clinical outcomes and safety outcome measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: Ulnar variance is a clinical measure used to determine the relative difference in length between the radius and ulna. We aimed to examine consistency in ulnar variance measurements and normative data in children and adolescents using the perpendicular and the Hafner methods. METHODS: Two raters measured ulnar variance on hand radiographs of 350 healthy children. Participants' mean calendar and skeletal ages were 12.3 ± 3.6 and 12.0 ± 3.7 years, 52% were female. Raters used the perpendicular method, an adapted version of the perpendicular method (in which the distal radial articular surface is defined as a sclerotic rim) and the Hafner method, being the distance between the most proximal points of the ulnar and radial metaphyses (PRPR) and the distance between the most distal points of both (DIDI). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intermethod consistency and inter- and intrarater agreement were calculated using a two-way ANOVA model. Variability and limits of agreement were determined using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The interrater ICC was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61-0.84) for the adapted perpendicular method, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) for PRPR, and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97) for DIDI. The intermethod consistency ICC was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.48-0.70) for perpendicular versus PRPR and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.70) for perpendicular versus DIDI. The intrarater ICC was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.70-0.95) for perpendicular, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.94) for PRPR, and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69-0.89) for DIDI. The perpendicular method was not useable in 38 cases (skeletal age ≤ 9 years) and the Hafner method in 79 cases (skeletal age ≥ 12 years). CONCLUSIONS: The perpendicular and Hafner methods show moderate intermethod consistency. The Hafner method is preferred for children with skeletal ages < 14 years, with good to excellent inter- and intrarater agreement. The adapted perpendicular method is recommended for patients with skeletal ages ≥ 14 years. KEY POINTS: • The perpendicular method for measuring ulnar variance requires extended instructions to ensure good interrater agreement in pediatric and adolescent patients. • The Hafner method is recommended for ulnar variance measurement in children with unfused growth plates and up to a skeletal age of 13 years, and the perpendicular method is recommended for children with fused growth plates and from skeletal age 14 and older. • The mean ulnar variance measured in this study for each skeletal age group (range, 5-18 years) is provided, to serve as a reference for future ulnar variance measurements using both methods in clinical practice.